Monsterliner
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to Gearhead Central. We are an automotive forum for all vehicles. We have areas for cars, trucks, semi trucks, motorcycles and recreational vehicles. It doesn't matter if you are just learning about cars or if your a die hard Gearhead, we have something for you. We have some new features to show you. Check out our showcase which is like a virtual garage. We also have competitions which is our contest software. You have to be a member to enter them but membership is free so sign up today.

Per the EPA, 2016 Mazda CX-9 Three-Row Is Most Efficient Non-Hybrid in Its Class

Discussion in 'News' started by Gearhead Central, Mar 2, 2016.

  1. Gearhead Central

    Gearhead Central Automotive news feeds

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    20,924
  2. Gearhead Central

    Gearhead Central Automotive news feeds

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    20,924
    [​IMG]

    -
    Mazda’s transformation of its U.S. lineup is nearly complete—the straggler Mazda 2 hatchback notwithstanding—and the CX-9 three-row crossover is the latest model to be completely redesigned under the new “Skyactiv” ethos. This bit of marketing hyperbole represents Mazda’s aggressive weight-savings design techniques and fuel-efficient engine technologies, and every vehicle introduced under the Skyactiv banner has offered very competitive fuel economy. The 2016 CX-9 and its just-released EPA fuel-economy estimates are no different, as they put the CX-9 at the top of the gas-powered, three-row crossover heap.

    -
    [​IMG]

    -
    The CX-9 is EPA-rated at 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway with front-wheel drive; all-wheel drive drops 1 mpg from each of those figures. That places the Mazda above the Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Hyundai Santa Fe, and Nissan Pathfinder. The front-wheel-drive Ford Explorer matches the front-drive CX-9’s 28 mpg on the highway, but that’s only with its optional turbocharged four-cylinder engine—the V-6 models and all-wheel-drive versions all fall short of the Mazda. The 2016 Kia Sorento, with its base 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine and front-wheel drive, manages to top the CX-9’s highway fuel economy by 1 mpg—however a third-row seat is optional in that model with that engine, meaning that the EPA fuel-economy figures likely only account for the lighter two-row iteration; in any case, the Kia’s 24 mpg combined figure is lower than the CX-9’s, as is its 21-mpg city estimate. Mazda, for its part, claims that the CX-9 is more efficient than every other “non-hybrid, midsize, three-row crossover SUV,” which would seem to exclude the base-model Kia Sorento. Either way, the point is that the Mazda is one of the most efficient three-row family haulers out there.

    --
    --
    Besides taking it to the rest of the three-row crossover field, the new CX-9 also handily beats the old CX-9’s fuel economy. This is partly due to its smaller, turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and new six-speed automatic transmission (the old model used a Ford V-6), while the rest can be chalked up to the roughly 300 pounds Mazda stripped from the CX-9’s curb weight. The new engine’s turbocharger also uses a clever, cooled exhaust-gas recirculation (EGR) system to keep engine temperatures low, thus reducing the need to add extra fuel to the combustion chamber to cool things off; without wasting fuel on cooling, fuel economy improves. Go figure. Mazda adds that the EGR setup may not effect the CX-9’s EPA fuel-economy estimates, but the automaker thinks it will pay off in real-world use. We’ll find out soon enough—the CX-9 goes on sale this spring.

    -
    [​IMG]

    -[​IMG]

    Continue reading...
     
Verification:
Loading...
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page